For all this focus on ICT, blogging, podcasting, computers in the home etc etc I am really a scientist through and through.
I can still remember my first science investigation when at the tender age of about 9 I did a couple of weeks survey of the seagulls that were settling on the playing fields outside of my parents semi council house in the London suburb of Eltham. I noticed that there was always more of them on bad weather days and I wrote to the ‘Old Codgers’ about them. For the uninitiated the ‘Old Codgers’ were a correspondence team working for the Daily Mirror (probably a set of young idealistic journalists). I’m not sure that the letter was published but I did receive a reply which was proudly passed around school.
Later I can remember vividly the moment when, two weeks before the Chemistry GCE examination I realised that a chemical equation could be treated like a mathematical equation . That one side of a chemical equation would equal the other side. This was quite a revelation because it mean’t that you didnt have to memorise hundreds of chemical equations and held me in good stead when it came to the chemistry degree five years later.
Then came the PhD ..what was it ….’The ortho-para hyrogen conversion over first row transition metal salts AND Molecular Complexes’. All good fun but what did it really mean. I wasn’t really sure so I decided that a life of research which was 15% being on a high and 85% boredom was not for me so I went into teaching.
It was only when I started teaching that I began to realise what science was really about. On my PGCE I can remember being inspired by reading for the first time about the history of science. Was this what I had been involved in for the last eight years of my life? However the pressures of teaching soon moved this to the back of my agenda and it didn’t re-emerge for the next ten years when I found myself in teacher training and particularly involved in primary science. I then found myself back with the seagulls and discovered what I had been involved in for all those years.
Why this little résumé? In 1990, there was a book published (just before the National Curriculum in the UK) It was part of a series called Assessing Science in the Primary Curriculum – Written Tasks by among others Mike Schilling, Linda Hargreaves, Wynne Harlen and Terry Russell. It is about an attempt to assess science process skills through written tasks. An impossible task but a brilliant attempt. Called the ‘Walled Garden Project’ it attempted to present pupils with tasks which upon completion could indicate observation, hypothesising, interpreting, measuring etc skills. When I read it in 1990 I thought it was the answer to all sorts of prayers (the SAT’s testers probably thought so as well). There was also another publication at that time called Match and Mismatch from Wynne Harlen (primary science guru). None of it really made a proper impact on the classroom which was unfortunate because they were looking at real science rather than the accepted traditional fact based subject.
I have this idea now that ICT can deliver what they wanted to deliver. In the real science world there is the all important idea which with preliminary observations becomes the hypothesis which then with the appropriate experimentation can become a proven hypothesis which is then tested again. This is almost impossible in the normal school environment but with the ICT communication and collaboration potential it could be possible.
My definition of science is that it is ‘Applied Curiosity’. Watch this space.
PS
I tried to induct my children into science as I walked them in the park and took them here and there. “Look there is a worm. Has it got any legs? Whats thats sticky stuff on its back? What does it eat? Where does it live?” One did an English degree, the other a Fine Art degree and the youngest a Sociology and Physcology degree. Maybe when they are a little older…………………..